Acceleration Is Gravity

There is no such thing as ‘gravitons.’ There is no such thing as ‘gravity waves.’ There is no such thing as ‘gravity.’ The scientists really don’t know much about gravity, and they are the first to admit it. Nobody has ever actually detected gravity. Some scientists say that "Gravity is a word we use in place of our ignorance." The concept of perpetually expanding matter is much less preposterous than the concept of 10 or 11 unknown physical dimensions in addition to the 3 spatial dimensions and the 1 time dimension that we can directly observe. String theory or ‘M’ theory is false. There are no extra dimensions, and no public funds should be spent in search of such things.

On January 24th, 2003, the Seattle-Post Intellegencer published an article about a gravity detecting experiment that hopes to prove the existence of extra dimensions by catching gravity mis-behaving at quantum levels. The most remarkable aspect of this experiment is that it will go for several years with absolutely no results. It’s designed that way. It’s designed by scientists at the University of Washington, a publicly funded school. New scientists are being trained to work for NASA on even more costly gravity detecting experiments. Please read the article at the following link.

There’s nothing like a good 10 or 12 year experiment that does not have to produce anything, to really enhance the employment security for a scientist. If you have a decade long experiment on your resume, you can demand top dollar on your next assignment. And if you can think up one of these experiments, you can write books, give lectures, and travel the world in style.

The evidence is in plain sight everywhere. The scientists are looking at the Universe backwards. By assuming that gravity is an attraction between objects instead of perpetually expanding matter, the scientists are literally looking through the wrong end of the telescope when they try to understand the redshifts they see when they look at distant galaxies. When they look at tiny particles close up, they can’t find any gravity there either. That is because it does not exist. Dark matter can never be detected because it does not exist either. And there is definitely no such thing as ‘dark energy.’

If you ask an astronomer "What is astronomy?" he will answer: "Astronomy is a study of the Universe." But astronomers don’t study the Universe, they study the sky; and they don’t study much else other than astrophysics which is almost completely theoretical. Most dictionaries define the word ‘universe’ as meaning: ‘All existing things.’ Astronomers do not study ‘all existing things,’ they just study the sky. The sky is not the Universe. The Universe includes all of reality, everything that physically exists, and everything that is non-physical but also exists. The sky is an extremely small component of our reality. The universe is all around us at ground level. The study of synchronicity or animal behavior or human psychology is also a part of the Universe. A true unification theory would be able to explain everything in reality, not just observations of physical matter. A true unification theory would have a complete answer for the origins of life, taking into account every bit of evidence ever discovered. The theory would be either all the way right or all the way wrong.

Einstein called it "rigidity." He said that if an initial theory (Newton’s) answered some questions, and a second theory (his own) answered more questions but not every question, there could still be a third theory that answers all questions. He said that a unification theory had to have rigidity, either it is all the way right and can not be modified, or all the way wrong. A third theory that could answer all questions would replace the first two.

In 1950, Albert Einstein wrote an article on gravitational theory for the Scientific American magazine. Einstein died in 1955 and he never did find that third theory. You can read the article if you have a Microsoft Encarta Reference Library. It is under the title "Side-bar: Einstein On Gravity." Einstein’s search for a unification theory failed. He spent the last years of his life searching, right up until he died. Here is something very interesting, that Einstein said:

"The first observation is that the principle of general relativity imposes exceedingly strong restrictions on the theoretical possibilities. Without this restrictive principle it would be practically impossible for anybody to hit on the gravitational equations, not even by using the principle of special relativity, even though one knows that the field has to be described by a symmetrical tensor. No amount of collection of facts could lead to these equations unless the principle of general relativity were used. This is the reason why all attempts to obtain a deeper knowledge of the foundations of physics seem doomed to me unless the basic concepts are in accordance with general relativity from the beginning. This situation makes it difficult to use our empirical knowledge, however comprehensive, in looking for the fundamental concepts and relations of physics, and it forces us to apply free speculation to a much greater extent than is presently assumed by most physicists. I do not see any reason to assume that the heuristic significance of the principle of general relativity is restricted to gravitation and that the rest of physics can be dealt with separately on the basis of special relativity, with the hope that later on the whole may be fitted consistently into a general relativistic scheme. I do not think that such an attitude, although historically understandable, can be objectively justified. The comparative smallness of what we know today as gravitational effects is not a conclusive reason for ignoring the principle of general relativity in theoretical investigations of a fundamental character. In other words, I do not believe that it is justifiable to ask: What would physics look like without gravitation?" 1950, Ablert Einstein.

Note the last sentence in Einstein’s statement. He did not feel justified in asking the question: "What would explain falling objects without gravity?" He did not feel justified in asking the question: "What would explain orbiting satellites without gravity?" Had he asked these questions, he would have found exactly what he was looking for. He turned over every stone but one, because he didn’t feel justified. He just didn’t want to look, that’s all. Have you ever lost your car keys, and then when you found them, they were in the one place you just did not look in?

Albert Einstein died unsuccessful in his quest to piece the Universe together, but the search did not end. Mankind’s scientist are still trying to put the puzzle together. The only problem is, they have all of their puzzle pieces upside down. Solely because of their steadfast belief in gravitational fields and attractive forces between objects, they are completely unable to perceive reality the way it actually is. This is why the Universe seems so mysterious and hard to understand. They are looking at everything backwards. Then they teach this backward view to every child born for the last 100 years. Ultimately, nobody can understand the Universe except for the highly paid scientists who spend all of their time trying to think up new experiments that take billions of dollars and decades to complete with no assurance of obtaining tangible results.

A backward view of reality is a false reality. This is why scientists can spend so many resources on things like trying to contact aliens from outer space. We taxpayers spent un-countable millions on a project called SETI, or Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence. How much do you think it will cost to station 3 satellites, 3 million miles apart, make them perfectly motionless relative to each other; and equip them with super powerful laser beams? How many 6 figure a year scientists, technicians, not to mention all of their vast support staffs and bureaucracies will be needed to accomplish this feat? No matter what anyone says that it will cost, we know that it will cost a lot more. If they say 7 years, it will probably take 12 years. How many years must this experiment run before a gravity wave happens to come by? And they admit right up front that detecting a gravity wave is just a hope, not a certainty. And if they say they detected a gravity wave, how would we know for sure? What if gravity waves really do exist? What difference does it make to dead soldiers? Or starving people? Or the people who die in the next infectious pandemic?